nexyo delivers the trust infrastructure that turns the EHDS from legislation into clinical reality. FHIR-native, policy-driven, auditable.
Eight use cases: from structured referrals to AI agents. Each solves a concrete trust and contract question.
Referral letters as FHIR bundles instead of faxes: encrypted, with patient consent, delivered in under 30 seconds.
Anonymized treatment outcomes in peer comparison. Medical chamber as trustee.
Structured case discussion in encrypted Matrix rooms. DICOM images securely referenced.
Standardized data access for research. Federated catalog, automated approval, secure processing.
Patient data available cross-border. IPS via MyHealth@EU, retrieved in seconds.
Diagnostic agents as controlled participants with their own credentials, policies, and audit trail.
Regulated evidence generation from real-world data. Pseudonymized, in secure processing environments.
Real-time syndromic data for early detection. Surveillance agent detects anomalies before reporting chains kick in.
Regulation (EU) 2025/327 has been in force since March 2025. Unlike a directive, it applies directly, with no national transposition required.
EHDS Regulation published in the Official Journal. Directly applicable in all 27 member states.
Each member state designates a National Digital Health Authority (NDHA).
Commission adopts implementing acts. European Electronic Health Record Exchange Format (EEHRxF) formally established.
MyHealth@EU: Patient summaries, ePrescriptions, eDispensation available cross-border.
Medical images, lab results, hospital discharge reports. Full interoperability.
The patient at the center. A patient in Vienna should be able to access their records from Munich: structured, machine-readable, in real time. Eleven member states already exchange patient summaries.
Health data for research and innovation, via Health Data Access Bodies (HDABs) as national gatekeepers. Opt-out instead of opt-in. In Germany, the GDNG enables access to data on 75 million insured people.
71% of EU countries use FHIR, but each with its own versions, profiles, and terminologies. ICD-10-GM, SNOMED CT, CDA: a tower of Babel in healthcare.
Every member state needs at least one HDAB. Most start from scratch: staff, software, and processes still have to be built. Frameworks need software to operationalize them.
Three consent models side by side (Tiered, Broad, Opt-out), but most hospitals manage consent on paper. Consent digitally linked to policy enforcement remains the exception.
Ransomware attacks on hospitals tripled between 2022 and 2025. Every new EHDS API is a new attack vector. Legacy systems from the 2000s now face security requirements at financial-sector level.
27 member states, 27+ HDABs, thousands of data holders, hundreds of thousands of researchers, all connected via a federated network. Without standardized software infrastructure, this is unsolvable.
AI agents increasingly access health data autonomously, often without clear authorization, dedicated credentials, or an audit trail. Neither the GDPR nor the EHDS fully addresses this gray area.
Every component must be technically implemented, organizationally governed, and legally secured. If one is missing, trust is missing.
Who is the participant? Four-tier Credential Cascade: eIDAS 2.0, EUDI Wallet, W3C DID, Verifiable Credentials. Every participant, human or agent, carries a cryptographically signed credential.
Under what conditions? ODRL policies encode purpose limitation, region, duration, anonymization. Machine-readable and enforceable, replacing legal prose in PDFs.
Is the agreement enforced? Policy Engine (OPA) checks every access in real time. Attribute-level enforcement down to FHIR field level. Automatic consent linkage.
Is everything provable? Every access is recorded in a tamper-proof log: who, which data, under which policy, when, with what result. Directly exportable for HDABs and the EU Commission.
Trust is delegated level by level: from the EU through the medical chamber down to the individual participant.
Sovereign health data exchange based on the EDC connector. Register FHIR servers as assets, policy engine as proxy, automatic EEHRxF validation. Three-hub model: Trust Provider, Data Provider, Service Provider.
The operational foundation for Health Data Access Bodies: permit management, federated data catalog, researcher portal, compliance reporting, opt-out management. All in one system instead of email chains.
EDC as foundation, multilateral policies instead of bilateral contracts (n instead of n²), multi-stakeholder orchestration for hundreds of participants. Gaia-X, IDSA, and iSHARE compliant.
Automates recurring compliance checks: legal basis, HDAB approval, opt-out, format conformity. The Pattern Factory codifies patterns from every engagement into automated modules.
nexyo processes FHIR R4 natively, without an adapter, mapping layer, or conversion step. The Data Trust Hub ingests FHIR bundles directly, validates against EU profiles, and enforces terminology compliance.
Every bundle is validated against HL7 Europe EU Base and Core Profiles. Non-conformant resources are rejected with structured feedback.
SNOMED CT, LOINC, ICD-10: the policy engine checks whether coding systems meet EEHRxF requirements and flags deviations.
Automatic pseudonymization for secondary use. PPRL enables cross-dataset research without exposing identities.
Software instead of PowerPoint: six demo organizations let you test governance, data flows, and FHIR integration in a live sandbox.
Secure exchange of sensitive research and trial data with partners, authorities, or AI service providers, legally sound and traceable.
Transparent, rule-based data transfer across the healthcare network, fostering cooperation, quality, and data sovereignty.
Access to trustworthy, compliance-ready datasets for the safe development of medical AI solutions and digital innovations.
Member overview in the Data Trust Hub
Process FHIR bundles with validation and terminology checks
Granular control of usage, duration, and onward sharing
Pseudonymization and PPRL for research & analytics
End-to-end encrypted communication in real time
Bots, webhooks, and bridges for seamless integration
Complete traceability for audits & compliance
Six governance functions that make the EHDS manageable for data holders, HDABs, and participants.
Standardized approval process for secondary use. Automatic compliance checks, transparent status tracking.
Decentralized data catalog based on HealthDCAT-AP. Metadata aggregation across all participants, standardized data descriptions.
ODRL policies, OPA real-time checks, attribute-level control at FHIR level. Usage rules are technically enforced.
Digital consent management: tiered consent, broad consent, digital opt-out with real-time propagation to all data access.
Tamper-proof audit trails, automated reports for HDABs, EU Commission reporting. GDPR accountability obligations covered.
AI agents as controlled participants: agent credentials, purpose-bound authorization, EU AI Act compliance, Pattern Factory.
Open source as foundation, proprietary intelligence as differentiation, consulting as entry point.
EHDS readiness · FHIR migration · HDAB setup consulting · Pattern Factory input
Data Trust Hub · Policy Engine · Federated Catalog · Compliance Platform · Agent Orchestration
Eclipse EDC · DSP/DCP · IDSA · Gaia-X · iSHARE · FHIR R4
Three hub types form the federated network: Trust, Data, and Service.
Projects delivered
Hubs in production
EDC participants in Health Sandbox
Data assets managed
Participant management in the Health Data Space
Data assets: FHIR resources with policy control
Secure connections between participants
The Health Console shows how nexyo Trust Infrastructure works in practice: analyze patient data, review governance, track compliance, all in one application.
Cohort analysis, diagnosis distributions, age and gender demographics, based on FHIR R4 resources.
Health score, trust formula, metadata quality, and asset classification: governance at a glance.
EHDS, GDPR, Data Governance Act, AI Act: compliance scores per regulation, broken down factor by factor.
Ask questions, get answers: the agent knows patient data, standards, governance, and compliance.
The demo runs entirely on anonymized sample data.